|
|
Post by mcimci on Jan 18, 2007 2:49:51 GMT -5
any proof?
|
|
|
|
Post by kkffvo on Jan 18, 2007 2:59:23 GMT -5
you cant deny that tvb is helping miss hong kong....but i dont think tvb will really be so obvious....they still need to worry about their own face and affairs with a lot of important organisations...and besides, i dont think aimee would actually benefit from all that "so-called" help, she has her own potential...
|
|
|
|
Post by mcimci on Jan 18, 2007 4:36:28 GMT -5
but it certainly unfair to others delegant
|
|
|
|
Post by jonathan1688 on Jan 18, 2007 9:20:04 GMT -5
but it certainly unfair to others delegant mcimci, Where is the verb of your sentence and what is noun "delegant". You should go back to grammar school now and come back to this forum next year. Bye! |
|
|
|
Post by mcimci on Jan 18, 2007 9:40:00 GMT -5
I have a question, Aimee Chan (No. 7 in MCT 2004) and Janet Chow (No. 2 in MCT 2004) both didn’t win in MCT 2004, how come can win in MHK 2006?  Which mean MHK 2006 the entire participant is low standard!!! And Aimee Chan lose to Lena Ma (No. 5 in MCT 2004 & No.12 in MCI 2005), And Lena Ma (No.12 in MCI 2005) didn’t win any awards in MCI 2005; it is impossible for Aimee Chan (No. 2 in MCI 2007) to win any awards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If Aimee Chan win (with TVB help), then how come she didn’t win MCT 2004 with Lena Ma? |
|
jenny
Full Member
Posts: 123
|
Post by jenny on Jan 18, 2007 17:23:52 GMT -5
To all members,
Just ignore any comments from insane mcimci or aime .......
Sour grapes' comments make us bitter,
presumption without solid proof make us angry,
repetitive postings make us sick ;
all the nonsense drive us nuts.
[glow=red,2,300]Time to send him/her back to Ching San![/[/glow]font][/b]
|
|
Which mean MHK 2006 the entire participant is low standard!!!